This is why perpetual motion machines are impossible. In other words, as the universe expands there will be less energy in a volume of space. This also means that once the Universe has transitioned into a state of expansion, it can no longer host the same action it had in the past everywhere because everywhere now has less energy than it had.
Join the ZME newsletter for amazing science news, features, and exclusive scoops. More than 40, subscribers can't be wrong. Back to our hypothethical universe, once it cooled down it had to deal with a thermodynamic quantity called the Helmholtz free energy density — a sort of pressure on all of space. In the model, this pressure was maximum in those moments following the Big Bang when there were only three dimensions. Knots exist for very subtle reasons.
The standard knot is a one dimensional curve which threads through three dimensions. It is more technically due to something called a Skein relationship with a polynomial expression. This relationship defines a term in a path integral called a Wilson loop. This is a knot invariant which is connected to the theory of complex variables. This also defines a skein relation! Here we are knotting tree dimensional spheres in seven dimensions.
The Skein relations define a Chern-Simons invariant 4? This is an invariant of the set of quaternions. It gets better! The next level is the Hopf fibration. You might notice a pattern with the dimensions here; the middle sphere has dimension equal to the sum of the dimensions of other two, and the two on the left and right differ by one dimension.
This first defines the algebra of real numbers, which has the following properties:. The next fibration for complex numbers removes the betweeness property — two points on two dimensions have no point between then in common, for a whole class of curves can connect them.
The quaternions are not commutative, and finally the octonions are not associative; in other words a bc — ab c is not zero in general.
This has certain graph representations in the Fano plane, which is a discrete system from the Moufang or projective Cayley plane. These are the sedenions, but they have no division algebra. A continuation of the Hopf fibration leads to something called Bott periodicity.
So I guess these 6 rather small dimensions might explain why the observable 3D universe is rather uniform across vast 3D distances? IF I understand the question. One controversial viewpoint reply: Why the uniformity through time, and similarity in space? I like that idea of the additional dimensions providing the physical controls that we observe in our three.
What limits it? Perhaps one of the other six dimensions has a controlling factor, a barrier. Interstellar travel, here we come. So the other dimensions could provide the underlying framework of our physical laws. There was not a bunch of debris that sprang out, whizzing out into the surrounding space.
In fact, there was no surrounding space. There was no debris strewn outwards. Space itself has been stretching and carrying material with it. For example, we tend to imagine a giant explosion. Experts however say that there was no explosion; there was and continues to be an expansion. Rather than imagining a balloon popping and releasing its contents, imagine a balloon expanding: an infinitesimally small balloon expanding to the size of our current universe.
String Theory may be perfectly compatible with the alternate Model, I just do not understand it enough. Perhaps cosmologists should run a competition to find a new more correct name for the creation event, perhaps with an apt acronym as a bonus. The steady state cosmology model of Hoyle, Bondi, Gold and Narlikar is dead as a doornail. If completely fails to match observational data. Further, if the universe were steady state something curious would happen. The smallest perturbation would cause it to either expand or collapse.
This perturbation could be a quantum fluctuation. How the universe emerged is still a work in progress. How the universe emerged and the physics behind it are not well understood. Smolin thinks that cosmologies quantum mechanically tunnel into existence by the vacuum polarization near singularities of black hole, where these black holes exist in other cosmologies within the multiverse setting.
General relativity does not describe topology changes. The universe may have emerged from a point, or some small spatial sphere that transformed into a flat space, but general relativity works with a geometry that maintains a constant topology. Geometry describes the gridded map of a space, say a map a surveyor works on land, but the topology is fixed. The physics of how a cosmology, or a spacetime, emerges may involve topology changes. The question about why space is three dimensional probably has something to do with this.
It might have something to do with the Hopf fibration issues I outlined below. These are very interesting problems to think about, and they do push at the foundations of our understanding of physics and cosmology. Using Diffraction i. Related Stories. Physicists investigate lower dimensions of the universe Mar 18, Dec 10, Feb 03, Stepping beyond our 3-D world Jan 18, Apr 20, Apr 27, Recommended for you.
First observation of an inhomogeneous electron charge distribution on an atom Nov 11, Nuclear radiation used to transmit digital data wirelessly Nov 10, Nov 10, Load comments Let us know if there is a problem with our content. Your message to the editors.
Your email only if you want to be contacted back. Send Feedback. Thank you for taking time to provide your feedback to the editors. A visualization of one object orbiting another in spacetime. It would be easy to get lost in the details of how general relativity—in which gravity is described by the warping of spacetime—translates from our experience in 3D to 2D.
But Scargill avoids this trap. First, he takes a step back to consider some of the key features of general relativity and neural networks that are necessary for life. Then, he goes on to see if those can be translated into two dimensions. Biological neural networks like the human brain are complex information processing systems composed of individual neurons and a web of connections that link them together.
Scargill puts it this way. What conditions are necessary for complex life? On the flip side, what would rule out the possibility of life?
0コメント